DEFENDERS of home-produced Scottish food this week expressed concern over the newly signed "memorandum of understanding" between the United Kingdom and agricultural powerhouse Brazil.
Campaigners are warning that the scene is being set for the importation of beef produced using growth-promoting hormones.
While the new accord with Brazil has not grabbed headlines in Britain, it has been widely reported in Brazil, where agriculture minister Tereza Cristina predicted that the UK would become more aligned with international rules on food safety, "closer to science-based approaches".
Ruth Watson of pressure group Keep Scotland The Brand noted that "science-based" food safety was debating shorthand for the United States-led position that the onus should be on legislators to conclusively prove a food or its production process was unsafe, before banning it from their market.
Under EU membership, Scotland and the UK employed the stricter precautionary principle that food would not be imported unless its country of origin could prove that it was safe.
Brazil, like the USA, is an enthusiastic user of growth-promoting and production-boosting hormones on its livestock, and has an equally aggressive trade policy aimed at exporting to high value markets like the UK. Watson was keen to sound an alarm over the current direction of travel.
"Scotland's farmers and our communities are faced with the results from this new deal with Brazil – assurances are being made that standards will not drop and yet I note with concern the Brazilian minister's comments about changes in phytosanitary standards enabling more exports to the UK post-Brexit," she said.
READ MORE: Will we be able to check menus for hormone-fed beef?
"It is worth noting reports from Brazil that domestic consumption of beef is falling. Given that beef farmers make up a significant section of President Bolsonaro's support base, I am very concerned we will see hormone-treated beef from pastures in felled rainforest shipped across the seas to compete with our premium, hormone-free Scotch Beef.
"This is very worrying. Scotland's people are used to good food as standard," she said.
"Brexit means this may no longer be the case. More now than ever, it matters that our food and drink is clearly labelled on the shelves so that people understand what is before them and can make informed choices."
The document, signed by Minister Cristina and Defra Secretary George Eustice (above), deals with the creation of a Joint Agriculture Committee involving Brazil and the UK, within which the two countries will work together to maintain the bilateral relationship in relation to trade in agricultural products, in addition to discussing possible trade arrangements in the future.
READ MORE: Meat exporters facing similar Brexit trade barriers to seafood, says Fergus Ewing
Last year, Brazilian exports of agricultural products to the UK increased by 5% compared to 2019, and are now well in excess of (US) $1 billion annually. Much of this is soy, poultry and fruit, and Brazil has welcomed moves by the UK to further increase this trade since Brexit, by deregulating some fruits, which no longer required Phytosanitary Certification.
Minister Cristina looked forward to more streamlining of her farming industry's interactions with the United Kingdom.
“We understand that, at this first moment, the United Kingdom will continue to adopt many of the European parameters, including sanitary and phytosanitary. But we expect that, over time, without abandoning its high standards, the UK, in its technical standards, will become more aligned with international rules, closer to science-based approaches," she said.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel