AT this point in time the Good Law Project, supported by a public crowdfunding initiative, is taking the Conservative government to court for its cronyism and lack of process in its awarding of contracts during the current health crisis.
What comes to mind, generally, is the colossal waste of public money and lack of scrutiny. At the centre of that would have to be the ill-fated HS2 project, currently £800 million over budget and projected to send the diggers into ancient woodland and heritage sites.
What is additionally offensive is the blatant southern bias of the project. It is little wonder that the Prime Minister is spending time trying to woo the new northern Conservatives who represent those areas where road and rail infrastructure is so poor.
READ MORE: We must escape the clownery and chaos of Downing Street
Those who argue that Scotland is “too wee, too poor” for an independent economy should take stock. Even if the first two or three years of budgeting were tentative in their efforts, it is clear that we could do so much better.
The launch of the Scottish Investment Bank was excellent news, while recognising it requires wider public involvement. Monday’s news report of its investment in a Clydeside laser technology firm is exactly the kind of development required to grow the economy (First investment as Scots national bank launches, November 23).
The draft Scottish constitution tying a Scottish currency to government control offers more possibility of a stable economy without casino-banking hands in the till.
There has been a distinct shift in the approach to what governments consider to be good governance – public health and well-being figure as they have not since JM Keynes and PM Attlee. The desire for honest dealing and public transparency has never been greater, particularly since the “reality television” approach of Donald Trump has been rejected by the US electorate.
An independent Scottish, clean, green economy beckons.
Maggie Chetty
Glasgow
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel