CORONAVIRUS is spreading “significantly” faster through England than the Government’s predicted “worst-case” scenario, according to new documents published by the UK Government’s Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies (Sage).
The group says that by mid-October, there were between 43,000 and 74,000 people being infected with coronavirus every day.
This, the Sage paper says is “significantly above the profile of the reasonable worst-case scenario, where the number of daily infections in England remained between 12,000-13,000 throughout October.”
In Scotland there were another 1281 positive cases reported yesterday, representing 6% of the total number of tests, the lowest positivity rate in three weeks.
There were also 28 deaths registered of a patient who first tested positive over the previous 28 days, down from 37 the previous day.
That takes the total number of deaths, under this measurement, to 2819.
Meanwhile, Richard Leonard has called for the ban on home visiting to be lifted on Christmas Day, saying a “rigid approach” would lead to Scots flouting the rules.
In an interview with the I newspaper, the Scottish Labour leader said the government needed to be “a bit more responsive to the human condition.”
Leonard said: “We think there needs to be an attempt to try to find sensible, special guidelines for Christmas.
“If we can have special guidelines for Halloween, surely we can have special guidelines for Christmas which are a bit more responsive to the human condition.
“If we are still at the point of having restrictions that prevent household-to-household contact indoors, then maybe there could be a relaxation of that for example.”
Last weekend, Bishop of Paisley, John Keenan, writing in the Sunday Times, urged authorities to consider a one-day “circuit-breaker” to allow loved ones to mix on Christmas Day. He compared it to the temporary ceasefire enacted on the Western Front during the First World War.
However, deputy chief medical officer Dr Nicola Steedman warned that the virus wouldn’t be any less contagious just because it’s a holiday.
“The difficulty with this particular amnesty is that our opponent, if you like, hasn’t agreed to the amnesty.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel