DOUGLAS Ross was putting it mildly when he said Boris Johnson has an “uphill task” in Scotland.
Survey after survey and protest after protest have shown that the Tory Prime Minister is about as popular as the poll tax.
Just last week, research showed Scots are four times more likely to trust Nicola Sturgeon’s government than Johnson’s to work for their interests.
WATCH: Boris Johnson can't explain why Scots trust Holyrood over Westminster
Ross is the man with the unenviable task of trying to pretend that Scots don’t think his boss is a clown.
He was asked at a fringe event at the virtual Conservative Party conference if the PM’s outlook “played” in Scotland.
He replied: “His approval ratings would suggest he’s got an uphill challenge to convince more and more Scots.”
Johnson does supposedly have one thing going in his favour, however.
“But he is a proud Unionist, he believes in the strength of the four nations of the United Kingdom,” Ross claimed.
Boris Johnson: I'm not to blame for surge in support for Scottish independence
Is that so?
We took a trip down memory lane to see what the Tory Prime Minister really believes about the Union.
The 'unjust' Union
In 2001, Johnson told “free-riding” Scots exactly what he thinks about their newly established legislative powers.
He wrote in the Telegraph: “Devolution is causing all the strains that its opponents predicted, and in allowing the Scots to make their own laws, while free-riding on English taxpayers, it is simply unjust. The time will come when the Scots will discover that their personal care for the elderly is too expensive, and they will come, cap in hand to Uncle Sugar in London. And when they do, I propose that we tell them to hop it…”
'Monstrous' devolution
Eight years on, it seems Johnson was still fuming about Scots being able to have limited control over their own affairs.
“I do think it pretty monstrous that you get free care for the elderly in Scotland and no tuition fees when you still get considerable subsidies from the rest of the UK,” the then-London mayor said. His team also gave a warning of what’s to come were he ever, by some sick twist of fate, put in charge of the UK.
“I do think it pretty monstrous that you get free care for the elderly in Scotland and no tuition fees when you still get considerable subsidies from the rest of the UK”
— Glenn Campbell (@GlennBBC) July 5, 2019
@BorisJohnson in 2009 on Scottish funding settlement - which his team say will “not change” if he’s PM pic.twitter.com/OzSrn80kod
Slating Strathclyde
Three years later, Johnson stopped being so coy about the issue. "A pound spent in Croydon is far more of value to the country than a pound spent in Strathclyde,” the future Prime Minister stated.
'Reckless' spending
In 2014, Johnson was fuming that Scotland wasn’t having its funding cut. He attacked David Cameron for making a "reckless promise" not to slash Barnett consequentials.
"I'm very keen on a Barnett formula which does justice to Barnet with one T [Barnet in north London],” Johnson said. “We can't just go on with a system that even Joel Barnett himself thinks is outdated.”
For a top Unionist, Boris Johnson doesn't seem to be very fond of the Union. Douglas Ross may want to consider that next time he's asked about his boss.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel