THE UK Government is to install a border in Kent for lorry drivers coming in from the EU after Brexit.
Cabinet Office minister Michael Gove told MPs that European hauliers would need a “Kent Access Permit” to get into the county from 1 January.
Earlier this week, the Tory sent a letter to the industry warning that if they do not prepare now for Brexit they could find themselves waiting in queues of up to 7,000 trucks.
Updating the Commons on the UK's preparedness for the end of the transition period in 100 days, Gove said: “We want to make sure that people use a relatively simple process in order to get what will become known as a Kent Access Permit.
“If they don’t have the material required, then it will be the case that through policing, ANPR cameras and other means, we will do our very best to ensure that … constituents [in Kent] are not inconvenienced,” he added.
Gove said the Government was outlining its "reasonable worst-case scenario planning assumptions", telling MPs it was not a prediction or a forecast but what could happen if preparations are not made and "if our neighbours decline to be pragmatic".
He explained: "The scenario builds on an estimate that only 50% to 70% of large businesses and just 20% to 40% of small and medium-size enterprises would be ready for the strict application of new EU requirements.
"In those circumstances that could mean between only 30% and 60% of laden HGVs would arrive at the border with the necessary formalities completed for the goods on board.
"They'd therefore be turned back by the French border authorities, clogging the Dover to Calais crossing."
Gove said this could lead to queues of "up to 7,000 HGVs in Kent", adding: "These queues and associated disruption and delay would of course subside as unready businesses who had their goods turned back at the French border would not want to repeat the experience.
"But it is clearly far better that everyone is aware now of what is needed to prepare rather than to face additional disruption next year."
Gove reiterated that the British people voted for change in the EU referendum.
He told MPs: "Now the Government is taking all these steps to help businesses prepare because change requires preparation and change is what the British people voted for.
"Because, outside the single market and the customs union, the UK can exercise all the freedoms and flexibilities of a truly sovereign state."
Shadow chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster Rachel Reeves said people must assume that these worst-case scenarios over the post-Brexit situation "will play out quite soon".
She said: "The news today that there could soon be tailbacks of 7,000 lorries is quite extraordinary.
"I know the Government has said that they are committed to building new infrastructure, but I didn't realise it meant concreting over the Garden of England.
"Today's warnings are based on a reasonable worst-case scenario, but given we have a reasonable worst-case Government, we have to assume that these scenarios will play out quite soon."
Meanwhile, the Scottish Government's Brexit secretary, Michael Russell said ending the Brexit transition period in 100 days would be “an act of extraordinary recklessness.”
He accused Tory ministers of adding "to the distress of COVID-19 with the economic damage and dislocation of Brexit."
Russell added:“While the Scottish Government is responding to one unprecedented crisis, we are now being forced to prepare for another crisis which could have been avoided - the reckless pursuit of either a ‘no deal’ or ‘low deal’ Brexit in little over three months’ time.
“As a responsible Government, we will continue to do everything we can to mitigate against the consequences of the end of the transition period, but we simply cannot avert every negative consequence of the UK Government’s policy.
“As we contemplate the damage of Brexit being willingly added to the damage and distress of the COVID-19 pandemic, fundamentally the Scottish Government view is that the best future for Scotland is to become an independent country.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here