LABOUR leader Keir Starmer struggled to explain why he no longer believes the SNP would have a mandate for a new Scottish independence referendum if they win a Holyrood majority next year during a visit to Edinburgh today.
In his first visit to Scotland since becoming the party’s leader, Starmer was challenged on why he said in January that the SNP would have a mandate for indyref2 under those circumstances but now argues a new vote is not needed.
His visit, which follows Scottish Labour MSPs' efforts to oust Richard Leonard from office, comes days after he insisted he strongly supports the United Kingdom and that “no-one in the Labour Party wants the UK broken up”.
Polling this year has shown that between a third and 40% of Scottish Labour voters would back independence. It has also shown a major shift in support for independence, with surveys showing the percentage of Scots now backing ending the Union between 53% and 55%.
The UK Government has not published its own polling on the issue, but it is understood that it shows the figure even higher than that.
ITV Border asked Starmer: “When I interviewed you on January 20 I asked if the SNP win a majority in the Parliament in the next Scottish elections, will they have a mandate for a second independence referendum – you told me, and I’m quoting you directly, you will have a mandate for that. You’ve changed your mind. Why?”
Labour leader @Keir_Starmer says 'with a pandemic like this' #indyref2 is not what people in Scotland want.@petermacmahon had asked him about a previous interview, in which he told us an SNP majority in the Holyrood election would give them a mandate for another referendum pic.twitter.com/q3F43OQG5i
— Representing Border (@ITVBorderRB) September 17, 2020
Starmer replied: “Well I don’t think that with a pandemic like this another divisive referendum is what anybody wants. And that’s why we will be focusing on what we see as the issues that really matter going into the next election which is what we’re doing to defeat the virus obviously but the economic fall-out, how we rebuild the economy and rebuild public services. So this about focus on what I think really matters in the here and now.”
The reporter pushed further, pointing to Starmer’s own criticism of the UK Government’s intention to breach international law by overriding the Withdrawal Agreement in the Internal Market Bill.
The journalist told him: “You’ve criticised the UK Government for ignoring parliament, ignoring law. The SNP would say if we win a democratic election with a commitment to a referendum we have that mandate. Why don’t they?”
The Labour leader answered the question by repeating parts of his first response.
“Well what I am saying is the campaign that we will run into May it will be based on the focus of the pandemic, rebuilding the economy, rebuilding public services, the things I think really matter most, not a divisive further referendum which I don’t think is what people want at the moment in Scotland,” he told the broadcaster.
READ MORE: Keir Starmer to visit Scotland just days after saying indyref2 was 'not needed'
SNP MP John Nicolson commented: "Keir looks uncomfortable. He likes to give straight answers to questions and wasn’t doing so here.
"But let’s test his contention about what 'people want' at the Holyrood elections."
Asked last week if he would stand in the way of indyref2, Starmer said: “We will go into the elections in Scotland making the argument for the Union and making the argument that we don’t need a referendum.
“Obviously that election is in May of next year and we’ll make the best case we can between now and then.”
Recent polling shows Scottish Labour is struggling to win over voters and could be on track to lose MSPs at next year’s vote.
The SNP is on track to win its second majority since the Scottish Parliament was re-established 21 years ago.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel