RUTH Davidson, Boris Johnson’s brother, and a newspaper owner have all been given cushy jobs for life in the House of Lords.
The Prime Minister also rewarded the former England cricketer Sir Ian Botham and billionaire Tory donor Michael Spencer.
Ex-chancellors Philip Hammond and Ken Clarke have also been bumped up to the Upper Chamber, while Theresa May’s husband, Philip, will receive a knighthood for “political services”.
The SNP’s Pete Wishart described it as the “worst kind of cronyism” while the Speaker of the House of Lords said it was a “vast pity” that so many new peers were being created.
READ MORE: Ruth Davidson officially given Tory peerage in PM's honours list
Johnson’s decision to boost the chamber’s numbers by 36 means that it will soon have almost 200 more members than the House of Commons - despite previous Tory promises to reduce the number of unelected legislators.
It’s not just the Tories and their big money pals who are being measured up for ermine gowns. There was also space being made on the red benches for some a number of former Labour politicians, including ex-Ayr MP Katy Clark. She had spent much of the last few years working closely with Jeremy Corbyn.
Frank Field, Kate Hoey, Ian Austin, Gisela Stuart and John Woodcock have also all been nominated for a place in the upper chamber.
Davidson promised she would stay on as the MSP for Edinburgh Central until her term ends next year.
The soon to be Baroness said: "I am honoured to follow in the footsteps of former Holyrood parliamentarians such as Jack McConnell, Jim Wallace and Annabel Goldie in being nominated for membership of the House of Lords.
"However, my main focus continues to be my Edinburgh Central constituency and I have confirmed that I will only take my seat after I cease to be an MSP in March."
Wishart said it was telling “that in the middle of a global health pandemic and economic crisis that is costing thousands of people their jobs, Boris Johnson is handing out jobs for life in the unelected House of Lords to friends and those who have done him favours.”
READ MORE: This is every new peer on the latest House of Lords honours list
He added:"The Prime Minister's idea of levelling up involves gifting his cronies, damaging policy facilitators, and family members with jobs as legislators for life - with no democratic mandate or accountability to people across the UK.
"It's the worst kind of cronyism that only highlights the rotten Westminster system that is detached from reality.
"It's clear beyond doubt that Westminster is simply not working for Scotland and that it is acting against our interests. The House of Lords needs to be abolished - not filled further to the brim at the taxpayers' expense.“
Lord Fowler, the Lord Speaker, said the list of new Peers marked “a lost opportunity to reduce numbers in the House of Lords.”
He added: “The result will be that the House will soon be nearly 830 strong - almost 200 greater than the House of Commons. That is a massive policy u-turn. It was only two years ago that the then Prime Mhinister, Mrs May, pledged herself to a policy of ‘restraint’ in the number of new appointments.”
The peerage for Evgeny Lebedev, the Russian-British owner of The Independent, The Evening Standard and London Live, is controversial coming just a week after report warned of how Moscow cash buys political access in the UK.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel