THE removal, officially or otherwise, of statues of men who accrued great wealth from the exploitation of slaves in their overseas plantations has been put on the unofficial agenda of the average fair-minded Scot.

Get rid of them, pull them down, resounds the cry, and until now no-one was more enthusiastic then I in this matter. However, what has made me stop and reconsider my stance is quite simple. You cannot change the facts of history, but can however correct its many errors.

If we pull down that statue, we help to hide that man and his crimes to humanity from the history books. People will walk by the empty plinth, and join the great ranks of the many who, when asked “what was there?”, will reply “I don’t know”. Sadly, as time passes they will add “I don’t care”.

READ MORE: Joanna Cherry: Scotland should consider black heritage centre

We should therefore keep the statues, but change or add an appropriate updated, historically correct inscription. Each case must be researched in detail and history societies submit their findings to an appointed jury who would word the findings on the inscriptions.

We should also make the same committee responsible for returning place names to their proper place. For example, the town of Fort William must be returned to its proper Gaelic name of Inverlochy. Those corrections will, or should, follow after independence.

Some say what’s in a name? Back in the seventies I took my family on a safari to see that great world wonder and largest waterfall in the world, Mosi-oa-Tunya (The Smoke that Thunders). You and David Livingston might call them The Victoria Falls.

More of our history and geography must be scrutinised and put right. That’s a must, but let’s get independence first, all else will follow.

Iain Ramsay
Greenock