FIRST Minister Nicola Sturgeon, her predecessor Alex Salmond and her husband, SNP chief executive Peter Murrell, will be questioned under oath when they give evidence to a Holyrood inquiry.
The committee set up by the Scottish Parliament to look at the Government's handling of harassment complaints made against the former first minster has confirmed it will take the unusual step when questioning witnesses.
But members of the Committee on the Scottish Government Handling of Harassment Complaints have agreed they will review that position when questioning vulnerable witnesses.
Some MSPs on the committee have argued taking sworn evidence under oath is necessary given the seriousness of its inquiry.
Committee papers have now confirmed this approach will be adopted, stating "as with any parliamentary committee, the committee has the ability to place witnesses under oath".
The papers add: "The committee has agreed that it will administer an oath/solemn affirmation for witnesses as a matter of course but that it will review this position in the case of any vulnerable witnesses."
READ MORE: MSPs hit out at Scottish Government over Alex Salmond files delay
The committee was set up to consider the actions of the Scottish Government and its advisers in dealing with complaints against Salmond. In March this year, the former first minister was cleared of 13 sexual offences by a jury following a trial at the High Court in Edinburgh.
Salmond, Sturgeon and Murrell are all listed as witnesses.
Scotland's most senior civil servant, permanent secretary Leslie Evans, is expected to be the first witness to be questioned when the committee starts holding evidence sessions in August.
The committee was set up after the Court of Session in Edinburgh ruled in January 2019 that the Scottish Government's actions in dealing with complaints made against the former first minister were "unlawful in respect that they were procedurally unfair and that they were tainted with apparent bias".
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article