A NO-Deal Brexit may have a far more severe impact on food supplies than coronavirus, according to academics.
Experts from Scotland’s Rural College (SRUC) have warned possible price hikes could make it harder for some people to consume the recommended five portions a day of fruit and vegetables. They looked at what could happen if the UK fails to secure a Brexit deal before the transition period expires at the end of December.
Cesar Revoredo Giha and Montserrat Costa-Font, from SRUC’s food marketing research team, said: “Whilst Covid-19 has already had an impact on prices and imports, a No-Deal Brexit may have far more severe effects on the food chain.”
They warned “the effect of a No-Deal Brexit may disrupt the fruit and vegetable supply in multiple ways”.
The pair spoke out after comparing the price of 20 fruits and vegetables between March and April this year and the same period last year.
During the coronavirus crisis, imports of fruit and vegetables from the EU have fallen, with the prices of onions up by 26.7% between March and April.
Over the same period, the prices of mushrooms and tomatoes also increased by more than 10%.
They noted the “significant price differences” in a blog post published by the London School of Economics and Political Science. The pair said the UK is “highly dependent” on imports of both fruit and vegetables, adding: “On vegetables, the UK imports more than half of the tomatoes, onions, cucumbers, mushrooms, peppers and lettuce it consumes.
“Between 75% and 100% of these products were imported from the EU in 2019. This share did not vary much during Covid-19, except in the case of tomatoes and onions, where we do observe a reduction of EU imports during the first quarter of 2020.”
The SRUC experts added such “disruptions” to the supply of fruit and veg could “exert important effects on their price and potentially consumption in the UK”. They said: “This can have important effects on the nutrition of the UK population, particularly for those with limited income, hampering any improvement towards the five-a-day goal.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here