SCOTLAND’S public spending watchdog has raised “serious questions” about the sustainability of the Cairngorm Mountain snow centre in a new report.
Highlands and Islands Enterprise (HIE) stepped in to save the resort for the second time when its operator went into administration in November 2018.
Now, Audit Scotland has recommended the enterprise agency “consider fully the options available before deciding on a new operating model for Cairngorm Mountain”.
In a report detailing the problems faced by the resort – which is the largest of five snow centres in Scotland – Audit Scotland said the closure of the funicular railway in September 2018 was the “main catalyst” for operator Cairngorm Mountain Limited (CML) entering administration.
The funicular railway was installed in 2001 as part of efforts to regenerate Aviemore. It could cost between £10 million and £15m to reinstate this – but removing it is also estimated to cost some £13.3m.
HIE has set up a new subsidiary, Cairngorm Mountain (Scotland) Limited (CMSL), to take over the operation of the resort.
Audit Scotland said it has “made progress in addressing some of the issues that arose under CML” but noted the new body generated an income of £243,000 between December 2018 and the end of March 2019, against expenditure of £804,000, leaving it with a deficit of £561,000.
The report says: “HIE must also reflect on the issues that have affected Cairngorm Mountain in the past and learn from them to develop a financially sustainable model.
“HIE has had to step in to take over operations at Cairngorm Mountain twice in the space of 10 years.
“This raises serious questions about the sustainability of the business operating under the current model.”
The report adds: “It is a business that is very reliant on weather conditions and any operator is likely to face unpredictable levels of turnover.
“With Cairngorm Mountain operating in already challenging circumstances, it is even more important that good management and decision-making structures are in place to avoid creating additional difficulties.”
The spending watchdog recommended ministers work with HIE to “identify what financial support will be needed for Cairngorm Mountain and how this cost will be met”.
It also called on the Scottish Government to “examine the long-term sustainability of the snow sports industry in Scotland and consider any future financial support in the light of its wider economic priorities”.
Auditor general for Scotland Caroline Gardner said: “HIE and the Scottish Government now face tough decisions on how to secure a sustainable operation at Cairngorm Mountain.
“The Covid-19 pandemic increases the uncertainty around the costs and business model required for the mountain in the longer-term.
“Any future spending decisions need to be informed by the wide range of groups with an interest in the mountain.
“And it’s important they should take into account the resort’s social and environmental impact alongside its economic benefits.”
Anas Sarwar, the acting convener of Holyrood’s Public Audit Committee, said: “The auditor general’s report makes it clear that developing a long-term sustainable model for financing the Cairngorm Mountain is vital. Covid-19 of course adds to that uncertainty.
“The committee will no doubt want to explore the lessons that can be learned from this experience and how these should inform the next steps.”
Cabinet Secretary Tourism Fergus Ewing said: “Cairngorm Mountain is an important natural asset and one which has the potential to provide significant input to the economy.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here