SHOPKEEPERS at smaller stores have seen a varied response to 50p minimum unit alcohol pricing but believe it allows them to compete with bigger supermarkets, a study into the policy’s impact has found.
Some small retailers have said there has been little change to their sales of drinks most affected by the policy, while others have noticed a reduction or have just stopped stocking the products.
Where drinks such as high-strength cider had their price increased due to the policy, shopkeepers told a Stirling University study that increased profit margin often compensated for any reduced sales.
The research also found fewer shops prominently displaying the price on the packaging on the most-affected products.
But shopkeepers told researchers that they feel “better able to compete with prices in supermarkets”, according to Martine Stead, from the University of Stirling.
The deputy director at the Institute for Social Marketing and Health said the vast majority of small stores implemented the policy when it came into force in May 2018 “with little or no adverse effect on small businesses”.
She added: “Retailers reported they had reduced or stopped stocking some products which had seen particularly large increases in price after the implementation of minimum unit pricing, such as larger bottles of strong ciders.
“Overall we observed the most change amongst the high-strength cider and perry categories, which had typically been priced below minimum unit pricing.
“Small retailers reported some changes in purchasing patterns, such as customers moving from higher to lower strength alcohol products, to products in smaller containers or to products perceived to offer better value now they were sold at similar prices.”
Scotland’s Public Health Minister Joe FitzPatrick said: “The positive findings show these retailers have experienced little or no adverse effects from the introduction of minimum unit pricing, with many reporting they can now compete with supermarkets on price.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here