DEPLOYING thousands of military personnel to assist with the coronavirus pandemic is "risky", a defence expert has warned, as the UK Government announced it intends to bring soldiers back from Iraq.
The UK Government stated yesterday that up to 20,000 service personnel will form part of a Covid Support Force.
And today it announced troops would be redeployed to the UK after a training mission in Iraq was paused for 60 days due to the global pandemic.
The UK will retain "key military personnel throughout the country" to ensure the interests of the Iraqi Government and Global Coalition are appropriately supported.
But Elizabeth Braw, senior research fellow at the Royal United Services Institute (RUSI), said the tasks troops would be expected to carry out in the UK were "not their speciality" and "essentially a distraction" from their normal duties.
She said: "With something like this, it is not exactly clear how the armed forces can support and more importantly we have to consider that they may be needed elsewhere," Braw told the PA news agency.
"We can't take for granted that we will only have a virus outbreak. What if there is another contingency, and I think that is the danger in relying on the armed forces.
"To always assume that they will always be available to help with these kinds of duties that are not their speciality and are essentially a distraction from their speciality is risky."
READ MORE: Boris Johnson's government to publish emergency coronavirus laws
The Ministry of Defence (MoD) said it was "fully engaged" with all levels of Government to work out how the military can provide a support role over the coming weeks and months.
As part of the Covid Support Force plans, 150 military personnel will be trained to drive oxygen tankers for the NHS, as well as providing general public support, the MoD said.
Armed forces minister James Heappey downplayed the severity of troops' involvement, after a video appearing to show several vehicles transporting tanks along a motorway raised speculation online.
"This is when social media is at its most ridiculous," he wrote on Twitter.
"We've got plans for offering all sorts of support during the Coronavirus outbreak. But absolutely none of them, not even one, involve tanks!"
READ MORE: Pharmacies urge people not to stockpile medicines
Around 10,000 troops are held at "higher readiness" in case of a civil emergency and this figure will be doubled in the effort to support public services amid the coronavirus outbreak, the department said.
Braw, who heads the RUSI Modern Deterrence Programme, suggested that in future "ordinary civilians" – including teenagers – should be trained to support in times of crisis.
"It's good that (the armed forces) can help this time, but it does raise the question of what we should do differently – this time it is too late, but for future contingencies," she said.
"Maybe the answer is to have trained civilians who can step in and help the blue light services and other government agencies when there is a crisis so we don't always have to turn to the armed forces."
Military personnel have been enlisted to assist in previous national emergencies, most recently during widespread flooding caused by storms Ciara and Dennis.
During the 2012 London Olympics, some 13,500 troops were called to provide logistical support and venue security.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel