SCOTTISH homeowners have been warned about the “hidden risks” of smart home security systems, after research revealed that 32% of residents are considering installing smart security cameras.
The study by specialist insurer Ecclesiastical showed that almost a fifth (19%) of Scots were also considering smart locks to bolster their security.
William Barne, of insurance broker Lycetts, has issued a “buyer beware” warning, and urged homeowners to consider the legal and insurance implications of their investments in smart security.
READ MORE: Questions raised over Russian bot use during indyref2
“Tech advancements offer welcome opportunities for internet-connected devices to protect our properties and this latest study suggests many local residents are taking home security seriously and are looking to take advantage,” he said.
“Smart CCTV systems can have a particularly powerful role to play in helping to deter opportunist burglars, but we have seen a number of cases in recent months where these systems have been compromised.
“This has served to heighten concerns about the vulnerability of IP-based cameras to would-be hackers.
“The UK Surveillance Camera Commissioner (SCC) recently launched a set of minimum requirements for manufacturers – but these are only a voluntary standard.
“People should consequently do their homework to ensure they are purchasing equipment that is as resilient as possible to cyber-attacks and data theft.”
Barne said homeowners who want to install smart CCTV tech should also ensure they respect the privacy of others and abide by their legal obligations under UK data protection laws.
READ MORE: The hashtag: How a dormant symbol became a force for good and ill
If images from their systems are captured beyond their property boundaries, they must have “clear and justifiable” reasons for doing so.
Although smart security systems are unlikely to affect home insurance cover, Barne recommends people to err on the side of caution and check with their insurance provider.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel