THE number of annual inspections of sites regulated by the Scottish Environment Protection Agency (Sepa) fell by a quarter over the last five years, prompting concerns about pollution.
Data obtained by The Ferret under freedom of information law shows that the number of site inspections by Sepa officers to check for environmental problems fell by more than a thousand between 2014-15 and 2018-19.
Sepa has also pursued fewer prosecutions against polluters breaking environmental law, with the number dropping from 23 in 2015 to eight in 2019.
The number of samples taken to gauge water ecology has dropped by almost a third, while the number of locations where samples were taken fell by almost a quarter.
READ MORE: Government figures reveal true extent of rural attainment gap
The falls have been criticised by one of Sepa’s former chief executives, experts, politicians and environmental campaigners. They warn that “mother nature is in intensive care” and are concerned that budget cuts have increased the risk of pollution.
Sepa insists that its “risk-based approach to regulation” ensures it is “targeting resources to the right areas” – and that “significant progress” has been made in environmental protection. The Scottish Government says it is now increasing Sepa’s budget.
The data released by Sepa shows that the number of annual environmental inspections across Scotland fell 25 per cent from 4172 in 2014-15 to 3108 in 2018-19.
There was a 33 per cent drop in the east of Scotland, a 24 per cent drop in the west, and a 19 per cent drop in the north. Sepa also pursued fewer prosecutions over the last five years, with 23 in 2015, 13 in 2016, six in 2017, one in 2018 and eight in 2019.
Polluters were fined a total of £29,300 in 2015, £113,100 in 2016 and £500 in 2017 – but no fines were recorded in 2018 and 2019. Some offenders were given community payback orders.
READ MORE: Post office closures a ‘disaster’ for some Scottish communities
Sepa stressed that the figures were “rolling” over years and represented the outcomes, rather than the reporting of cases. “Reports submitted in a year are very rarely concluded in the same year,” it said.
Revelations about the declines in inspections, prosecutions and water sampling come as Sepa’s latest assessments of more than 5000 sites show that compliance with environmental rules is getting worse.
The number of sites rated by Sepa as “at risk”, “poor” or “very poor” for pollution or environmental breaches rose from 440 in 2016 to 489 in 2018 – an increase of 11 per cent.
They included 37 fish farms, 34 public sewage works, Donald Trump’s Turnberry golf resort (above), Gordonstoun school, Gleneagles Hotel, INEOS at Grangemouth, ExxonMobil in Fife, a Dundee waste incinerator, a Dunbar cement works and many more.
In 2019, The Ferret reported that Scottish Government funding for Sepa had been slashed by 34 per cent from £52.5 million to £34.4m between 2010-11 and 2019-20.
A report for Scottish Environment LINK, a coalition of more than 35 groups, estimated that almost £100m had been cut from the budgets of eight Scottish environment bodies.
Professor James Curran, who was Sepa’s chief executive from 2012 to 2015 and now chairs the environmental research group The James Hutton Institute, expressed concern about the cutbacks in inspections.
“A decade of austerity has resulted in a climate and biodiversity emergency and mother nature is in intensive care,” he said.
READ MORE: Heathrow expansion will increase Scottish emissions
“We urgently need sound science to determine how to treat her, and good monitoring to check if she’s recovering. If not, we run the risk of losing the patient.”
Friends of the Earth Scotland stressed that Sepa needed to be equipped to “crack down” on the companies that were failing to take their environmental responsibilities seriously.
“The new approach of prioritising the worst offenders certainly makes sense in principle but, with fewer inspections overall and worse compliance in 2018, we still remain to be convinced that this plan is really working,” said the environmental group’s campaigner, Sarah Moyes.
Scottish Labour described the drop in inspections as “very concerning” and demanded an end to the cutbacks. “We cannot allow standards to slip as we simultaneously tackle the climate and environmental emergency and leave the European Union and its environmental protections,” said the party’s environment spokesperson, Claudia Beamish MSP (below).
“The health of our environments, sustainability of industry and living standards of communities rely on Sepa’s monitoring and governance, and the Scottish Government should invest in this.”
Professor Andrew Watterson, head of the Occupational and Environmental Health Research Group at the University of Stirling, stressed that without inspections of specific sites, it would not be possible to ensure that businesses are complying with environmental laws.
He said: “As we face major climate change challenges in Scotland along with global pollution problems, it is vital we have a credible, trusted and transparent regulator, recognised by all to be independent, well-resourced and staffed.”
He argued that it was “especially important that Sepa ensures accessible, comprehensive and understandable data on inspections, compliance and monitoring” were publicly available “especially for local communities most affected by the actions of the regulator”.
READ MORE: Police Scotland Taser use sees sixfold increase over five years
Sepa needs to be able “to address not just the risks, but the obvious and preventable hazards we all face,” Watterson added.
“This needs to be reflected in the statistics of the regulator and currently that picture looks distinctly foggy.”
WWF Scotland argued that public bodies had a “vital role” in responding to the nature and climate emergencies. But “with squeezed budgets in recent years it has become harder to do more with less,” it said.
Gina Hanrahan, the environmental group’s head of policy, said cutbacks had forced Sepa to conduct “increasingly focused inspections where there’s a higher risk of breaches”.
She welcomed new funding for Sepa in the Scottish Government’s 2020-21 draft budget, but said the public bodies “are still playing catch up after years of cuts, at a time when the crisis for nature is worsening”.
Sepa argued that “targeting resources to the right areas has resulted in environmental compliance of Scottish business exceeding 90 per cent for the third year in a row”.
READ MORE: Councils sprayed 170,000 litres of weedkiller linked to cancer
Efforts in “tackling public priorities” included “driving investment to secure compliance at ExxonMobil’s Mossmorran complex (below) and “ensuring all of Scotland’s businesses meet their legal obligations”, a spokesperson said. Sepa highlighted that its first dedicated environmental enforcement unit was launched in 2019, and that it helped establish the multi-agency joint unit on waste crime with England’s Environment Agency.
“As a public agency it’s right that we’re held to account for our record,” added the spokesperson. “It’s right that we recognise the significant progress made in protecting and enhancing Scotland’s environment and that we match available resources to where they matter most.”
The Scottish Government said that its 2020-21 draft budget announcement promised a £500,000 increase for Sepa.
READ MORE: Abuse fears over ‘revolving doors’ between politics and lobbying
“This is in addition to a forecast increase in income from charging those it regulates, which now makes up more than 50 per cent of Sepa’s budget,” a government spokesperson said. Charging had helped Sepa to increase its income from £33m in 2008-09 to a projected £41.5m in 2019-20, said the spokesperson.
“Sepa’s inspection programme is set independently of government, and is targeted and risk-based to make the best use of available resources whilst carrying out their statutory functions.”
The Ferret is an editorially independent, not-for-profit co-operative run by its journalists and subscribers. You can find it at https://theferret.scot/ and can subscribe for £3 a month here: https://theferret.scot/subscribe/
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here