EUROPEAN fisheries ministers begin two days of talks today to address concerns within the sector as the Brexit deadline looms ever closer.
There are fears that European fleets could be given access to UK waters in exchange for city financiers being allowed favourable access to the bloc’s financial services markets after January 31, the date scheduled for the UK’s withdrawal.
However, the head of one Scottish fisheries organisation has said the debate is couched in “glib language” and “no-one knows what it actually means”.
Fiona Matheson, secretary of the Orkney Fisheries Association, said the subject of quotas was a “non-issue”.
READ MORE: Brexit: Scottish Government frozen out of Westminster talks
“Much of it, especially in England and Wales, is owned by foreign companies,” she said.
“The nominal UK ownership of that quota is under a ‘flagged’ system where the vessels may be registered in the UK but the companies owned outwith.
She continued: “For England especially where much quota is already owned by European Union companies, they would most likely be seeking a retention of their status quo.”
Matheson said the reality was that there would only be significant change if the EU’s method of allocating catch on a 20-year-old method of relative stability has updated. This sees a snapshot of the percentage
of fish for each EU state fixed at that point in time irrespective of the location of where they were found.
Matheson said much of the industry would like to see allocations change from the current system to one that reflects the area of sea where the fish are found, which would benefit Scotland hugely.
She added: “Some sectors of the industry feel that much could be done domestically at UK and Scottish level in terms of fairer allocation of what the UK/Scottish governments currently have responsibility for.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel