TWO-third of Scots are either “very” or “fairly” aware of how political parties target or tailor adverts based on the analysis of their personal data, a new survey has shown.
The research from the Open Rights Group (ORG) showed that 64% of Scots were aware of the practice, but only half said they were aware of “dark money” adverts, where the source of payment for them was not known.
This compared to national findings of 63% and 48%.
ORG commissioned YouGov to conduct two polls a week after the General Election to gauge public attitudes towards data-driven campaigning practices. One was nationally representative while the other sampled some of the country’s most marginal constituencies – and some of the constituents most likely to experience these activities.
Overall, the ORG said its polls highlighted a worrying lack of national awareness around “nefarious” online campaigning activities – with a third of Scots (33%) and 27% nationally unaware of them.
READ MORE: YouTube takes down Tory adverts featuring edited BBC footage
The national sample showed 42% of people were aware of undeclared spending donations, or dark money, and 44% of “dark ads”, online adverts only seen by the recipient. Just over half (54%) of those in the national sample were aware of the targeting or tailoring of adverts, known as political microtargeting.
However, a majority of the national sample said they were against these practices happening during an election, with the strongest opposition to dark money (69%).
Microtargeting was opposed by 63% of Scots in the sample and dark money advertising by 81%.
There was broad support in the study for a range of responses, but tougher punishment was the most popular remedy, supported by 80% of Scots and 78% across Britain.
On a positive note, the ORG said the polls suggested that the more people are aware of the data-driven campaigning practices which dictate our politics, the stronger the support for interventions.
Pascal Crowe, the data and democracy project officer at Open Rights Group said: “Political microtargeting, AstroTurf ads and unaccountable money are upending our electoral system.
“Despite this, citizens remain in the dark.
“The onus is now on politicians to take the initiative and push electoral reform up the legislative agenda. The time to act is now.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here