THE wishes of the Scottish people to make our own decisions about how we in Scotland should live our lives are being increasingly well aired. The conclusion that we should be independent is a product of two circumstances: (a) the history of Scotland since 1707, and (b) an assessment of our future after December 12 2019. The first of these cannot be altered but is germane to the second.
Regarding our social and economic life there is no denial that 1707 brought some improvement – whether inevitable or resultant cannot being undetermined. Our universities flourished, our health prospects gradually improved, generally our housing conditions showed upgrading, our requirement for all levels and types of employment steadily grew, and the reputation worldwide of our countrymen in education, innovation, adaptability and intrinsic skills – not to mention the respect in which our armed servicemen were held – grew apace.
READ MORE: Political debates on TV need not descend into stairheid rammies
If one turns even a few pages, however, it is inescapable that as a “nation, an equal partner” with England, one finds matters which we regret and others for which England’s institutions must take responsibility. These will include wholesale deportations post-1745, Highland Clearances, slum conditions resulting from exploitation and the industrial revolution, naked profligacy in use of our soldiery, apparent unrestricted appropriation of our land by foreign interests, population growth a mere fraction of that of England, subordination of the teaching of Scottish history, steadily diminishing political influence. The fact is that Scotland has “grown up” and is perfectly capable of independent thought and action to provide for itself a future better than that which is on offer from the Union.
The “Brexit” election will determine the ultimate outcome of 2016. We in Scotland will have the opportunity to show, thanks to the obsession with Scottish independence afflicting the Unionist fraternity, how we judge our future in their hands rather than in our own. That decision will in Scotland take account of factors (a) and (b) already noted.
J Hamilton
Bearsden
LET’S wind the clock forward, and see what the future brings.
The electorate has spoken. We have a Prime Minister of these islands. Scotland’s First Minister is enjoying the success of yet another General Election. The SNP has increased the number of MPs again. The other parties in Scotland have suffered yet another humiliation with a substantial loss of support.
The First Minister drafts a letter to Westminster asking for a Section 30 order to get permission to hold an independence referendum. Having waited and received no reply, another request is sent. This time a junior government minister replies with an emphatic NO!!
The utter contempt for democracy is clear ... but wait, why are we surprised and shocked with such a dismissive response? It’s the same attitude displayed to Scotland as before. NOTHING CHANGES!!
Since the Union Of Parliaments Treaty of 1707, we have been absorbed into England as a subordinate northern region – just get into your box and stay there!!
What are we going to do about this? They have called our bluff, and now they are daring us to do something about it.
We have been told NO!! Do we still play Mr Nice Guy and say “that’s no fair!”
OK, that is just a possibility some time soon. It’s just fantasy, isn’t it? They will honour Scotland’s wishes? They wouldn’t dare remove some powers of our parliament, or worse still, dissolve it!!!
Answers on a postcard please!!
Anonymous
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel