THE Scottish Secretary has accepted that an SNP majority at the 2021 Holyrood election would provide a "democratic mandate" for indyref2.
Speaking to BBC Radio Scotland this morning, Jack contradicted the Tory leader's pledge to block a second Scottish independence referendum in any circumstance and indicated an SNP majority in 2021 could trigger a fresh vote.
The Dumfries and Galloway Tory candidate was asked about Boris Johnson's refusal to debate the First Minister ahead of the December 12 General Election.
READ MORE: Alister Jack to reveal proposals on 'improving' devolution relations
He said: “He’s quite right to say that he won’t debate her on the basis that she’s not a candidate to be prime minister.”
Then asked if Johnson was running scared of such a debate, Jack replied: “He’s not running scared at all. He’s made it very clear that the once in a generation decision was taken in 2014, and he’s made it very clear that we do not support a second independence referendum. We believe that decision was taken.
“We should take away the uncertainty, as we believe we should with Brexit, remove the uncertainty of independence, start growing the Scottish economy.”
The Scottish Secretary was then asked if the SNP winning a majority of Scotland's 59 seats at next month's election would provide a mandate to grant a Section 30 order. He replied: "No."
READ MORE: Alister Jack makes bizarre comment about audience size at Tory conference
When asked why not, Jack said: “Because the democratic mandate for a Section 30 order is a matter for 2021. We’ll see whether or not the Scottish National Party get a majority then.
“I mean the Scottish National Party - not in collaboration with other parties, not in any alliances - but a Scottish National Party majority, which is what Ruth Davidson pointed out some months ago.”
Earlier this summer, while she was still Scottish Tory leader, Davidson had suggested an outright SNP majority at Holyrood would be a sufficient mandate to hold indyref2.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel