ITV will exclude the SNP from its televised election debate, the High Court has heard.
A head-to-head debate between Boris Johnson and Jeremy Corbyn is due to air on Tuesday night, which will exclude any other party leaders.
The LibDems and the SNP are contesting the broadcaster’s decision to leave their party leaders out of the debate at a court hearing in London.
READ MORE: Ian Blackford: It's an outrage to not represent SNP in ITV debate
Lawyers for the SNP said the party represents a range of views which would not be represented in a debate between Labour and the Conservatives, including on Brexit and Scottish independence.
Philip Coppel QC said: “Prior to 2010 it may have been the case that a debate between the Labour and the Conservative leaders would cover the full range of significant views in a general election.
“That was, arguably, a time when those parties encompassed the spectrum of mainstream political opinion.
“That is no longer the case. In the current, pluralistic political landscape it is simply not possible for a debate which only includes two parties to include ‘all significant views’.”
ITV lawyers told the court the debate – and an interview with LibDem leader Jo Swinson due to follow it – will be pulled from its schedule altogether if the two judges hearing the case find ITV has breached its duties under the Broadcasting Code.
Lawyers for the LibDems argued that Brexit is the “dominant” issue in next month’s General Election and that “the voice of Remain has been excluded” by ITV’s failure to include the party’s leader Jo Swinson in the main debate Guy Vassall-Adams QC said the broadcaster’s decision not to include the LibDems was unlawful because it “breaches the duty of impartiality and the requirement to give due weight to a wide range of significant views”.
He told the court: “The dominant issue of this election campaign is Brexit, which is on any view a matter of major political controversy and current public policy.
“In the first national TV debate of the campaign it is essential that a wide, balanced range of views on Brexit is represented.
“But the only invitees are supporters of Leave, with the Conservatives advocating leave and Labour proposing to negotiate its own deal to leave.
“The views of millions of Remain-supporting voters, regardless of party affiliation, will not be represented in the debate.
“This has serious consequences for the fairness of the democratic process of which leaders’ debates, a form of hustings, form a significant part.”
He also said there was evidence that the televised debates affect people’s voting intention, adding: “This is a TV debate on a free-to-air broadcaster that will go to every home in the country.
“It will attract millions of viewers… such live TV debates are very influential with voters.”
ITV lawyers contend its decision is not capable of challenge in the courts and that, in any event, there is no basis for alleging any unlawful conduct on its part.
LibDem representatives lodged papers at the court in London last week and said it was “vital for our democracy” to have both sides of the Brexit debate included in TV debates during the election campaign.
Speaking ahead of the hearing, the SNP’s leader in Westminster, Ian Blackford, said: “This challenge is not just about the SNP, it’s about fairness for every voter and viewer across the country who have a right to see the real choice at this election on that debate stage.
“By excluding key parties from the debate, viewers are being deprived of the opportunity to make their own decisions, and voters in Scotland are not seeing their voting patterns reflected at all.”
Sky News has proposed a November 28 date for its debate, while the BBC has confirmed it will host two debates, on November 29 and December 6, in addition to a series of Question Time specials.
Lord Justice Davis and Justice Warby indicated that they will give a decision after 4pm on Monday.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel