DAVID Mundell has described the next Scottish Parliament election in 2021 as a "pivotal moment" in determining whether a second referendum on independence could be held.
Mundell, who was replaced as Secretary of State for Scotland earlier this week as part of new Prime Minister Boris Johnson's Cabinet reshuffle, said that securing a unionist majority at Holyrood would prevent another vote on the issue from being held.
And he said that Johnson must give his backing to Scottish Tory leader Ruth Davidson - who did not support him during his campaign to succeed Theresa May at Number 10.
In an exclusive interview with the Scotland On Sunday newspaper, Mundell said: "There's nothing inevitable about having a second independence referendum, and certainly not in the short term.
"I do think that the 2021 Scottish Parliament elections will be a pivotal moment.
"I regret that, because those elections should be about the Scottish Government's record on health and education and drugs and all the rest of it, but you can already see the direction of travel, that it is effectively going to be a referendum on a referendum."
He added: "It's a very clear message that the way to stop another independence referendum is to ensure a unionist majority in the Scottish Parliament in 2021, so that involves Boris backing Ruth to deliver."
Mundell's successor at the Scotland Office, Alister Jack, said that the UK Government would reject any request by the Scottish Government for a Section 30 Order, which would transfer powers to Holyrood so that a referendum could take place.
Asked whether such a request would be accepted, he said: "Absolutely not. We decided that in 2014."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel