Last week, we looked at sparkling wines in a Champagne style, but on a smaller budget. Today, I say we blow the budget and go deluxe. Are the top Cuvées really worth it, what should you choose and how much should you spend? Do you know your Cristal from your Comtes de Champagne, and can anything compare to Krug?
Krug is a blend of 120 different wines from ten different vintages, and it’s aged in oak barrels adding a luscious quality and depth to the wine. It really is quite unique. It’s also very food-friendly, working with everything from the poshest seafood to eggs benedict at breakfast time.
Krug Grande Cuvée NV (Waitrose, £135). This is a remarkably good price for a bottle that will almost certainly change your life. I’d suggest calling ahead to make sure your local store has stock, as availability is always limited.
Krug Grande Cuvée NV half bottle (Inverarity One to One, £81.49). Krug are one of the very few houses to offer their deluxe Cuvée in a half bottle.
Krug Grande Cuvée NV magnum (Inverarity One to One, £400). And they do large bottles too.
Most other Champagne houses focus on elegance and finesse with their deluxe expressions. You’ll often see ‘blanc de blancs’ on the label, which simply means only white grapes have been used in the production of the wine. In Champagne terms, this means it has to be Chardonnay, and Chardonnay from the Champagne region is amongst the most elegant in the world.
Taittinger Comtes de Champagne Blanc de Blancs Brut 2007 (Waitrose, £129.99). This was James Bond’s favourite Champagne in the Ian Fleming novels, and it featured in the movie From Russia with Love. If it’s good enough for James…
Dom Ruinart Blanc de Blancs 2002 (Inverarity One to One, £140). Ruinart is the oldest Champagne house, and one of my long-term favourite producers. The Blanc de Blancs 2002 is, quite simply, the finest expression of the style that you’re likely to come across. It was a perfect year for the Chardonnay grapes, and the purity of fruit in the glass is astonishing. You can drink this immediately, or put it away for another few years.
Cheers!
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here