POOR old Boris Johnson is getting a bit of bad press at the moment.
Recently he’s been under fire for hiding from public scrutiny while in a contest to decide the UK’s next prime minister.
The leadership race frontrunner has also been criticised for a proposed £9.6 billion tax cut for high earners, which Scots may have to foot the bill for.
READ MORE: Finance Secretary Derek Mackay urges Scottish Tories to block Boris Johnson's tax plan
Now he has had more scorn poured on him by Ian Blackford, who described Johnson as “racist” and “not fit for office” at PMQs.
The comments prompted Speaker John Bercow to intervene, urging the SNP Westminster leader to "weigh his words" as Tory MPs shouted "withdraw".
But Blackford doubled-down on his statement, citing comments by Johnson comparing Muslim woman to “letterboxes” and describing African people as having “watermelon smiles”.
READ MORE: Ian Blackford launches astonishing attack on Boris Johnson
Luckily for the former foreign secretary, a somewhat miffed Tory colleague came to his aid.
Raising a point of order in the Commons – and trying admirably but ultimately in vain to contain his rage – Bill Wiggin addressed Bercow, saying: “Since you take the chair sir, you have been a stalwart defender of backbenchers.
“You have also stood up to bad parliamentary behaviour, like the use of the word racism.
“I am deeply upset that your chairmanship has been undermined dramatically because of the very calm and polite advice you gave to honourable members – leaders of political parties – in this House that was ignored.”
At this point, Wiggin’s already rosy complexion was starting to radiate.
“Please will you do all you can to ensure that words like ‘racist’ are not common parlance in this House,” he added.
Bercow thanked the Tory MP for his “kind words”, but was at pains to point out that “I’m not a delicate flower and I don’t feel any concern on that front”.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel