WIKILEAKS founder Julian Assange has been ordered to face a full extradition hearing next year, despite his legal team calling the charges he faces in the US “an outrageous and full-frontal assault” on journalistic rights.

Assange, 47, is fighting against being extradited from the UK to the US where he faces an 18-count indictment that includes charges under the US Espionage Act. He is accused of conspiracy to hack into a Pentagon computer.

The extradition case was formally opened at Westminster Magistrates’ Court, after an extradition request was signed off by Home Secretary Sajid Javid. Assange, 47, appearing via video link from prison, where he is being held for a bail breach, told the court that “175 years of my life is effectively at stake”.

Mark Summers QC, who represents Assange, stated that there is a “multiplicity of profound issues” with the extradition case, before going on to say that “it represents an outrageous and full-frontal assault on journalistic rights”.

The Chief Magistrate of England and Wales, Emma Arbuthnot, ordered that a five-day court hearing begin on February 25. It also emerged Assange plans to appeal his 50-week bail breach sentence.

Ben Brandon, representing the US, formally opened the case, stating Assange’s alleged actions represented “one of the largest compromises of confidential information in the history of the United States”.

Brandon further alleged that evidence will show that Assange “first encouraged” former US army intelligence analyst Chelsea Manning to illegally obtain documents. He then agreed with her to “crack” a password hash on a Pentagon computer, the lawyer continued.

“By taking steps to crack the password hash, it’s said that Mr Assange was also attempting to illegally obtain and receive classified information,” Brandon said.

The documents relate to the Iraq and Afghanistan wars and, the lawyer alleged, including information on secret intelligence sources.

Jennifer Robinson, a lawyer representing Assange, said outside court that the US indictment “will place a chilling impact” on journalism and publishers “all over the world”, and stressed the importance of material WikiLeaks published as it included “evidence of war crimes, human rights abuse and corruption the world over”.