WHAT’S THE STORY?
IT may have seemed like just another of his vainglorious boasts, but it now appears possible that President Donald Trump’s pledge to get humans back to the moon may just happen in the course of his second presidency, should he be re-elected next year.
American space agency Nasa has revealed details of Project Artemis, its ambitious scheme to land on people on the moon and build a hopefully permanent settlement there.
By 2024, it will have been 52 years since the two moon walkers from Apollo 17, Eugene Cernan and Harrison Schmitt, were the last astronauts to visit our nearest neighbour in space.
WHY ARTEMIS?
THE designated name of Artemis harks back to the Apollo missions, Artemis being the twin sister of Apollo and the goddess of the moon in Greek mythology. She was also the goddess of the hunt and archery, and was certainly a dynamic goddess. The name is also a fitting choice because Nasa has stated that Project Artemis will see women astronauts take part in the mission and one will become the first female on the moon.
WHAT IS THE AIM OF ARTEMIS?
ACCORDING to NASA when it confirmed the name of the project earlier this month, Project Artemis will fulfil the aim enunciated by Vice-President Mike Pence earlier this year – that Nasa should land a man and the first woman on the moon within five years. Nasa has issued grandiose videos saying how they are definitely going to the moon, and then further into space. Put it this way, if Artemis doesn’t fly they are going to look pretty stupid. Over the last few days, leaks of information have confirmed the scale of the project. Anywhere between $6 billion and $8bn and more – on top of Nasa’s £20bn annual, budget – will be spent on 37 launches and the creation of a “lunar base” on the Moon by 2028. There will be a “gateway” station in orbit around the moon, part of an international project to explore Mars and beyond.
IS THE US REALLY GOING TO SPEND ALL THAT MONEY?
IT looks like it. China and India have already expressed an interest in moon colonisation, while Russia and Nasa are already cooperating on the Lunar Gateway and it would not be far-fetched to suggest presidents Putin and Trump could decide to do a joint venture in establishing a lunar base.
Donald Trump approves of the plan. He tweeted: “Under my Administration, we are restoring @NASA to greatness and we are going back to the Moon, then Mars. I am updating my budget to include an additional $1.6 billion so that we can return to Space in a BIG WAY!”
Under my Administration, we are restoring @NASA to greatness and we are going back to the Moon, then Mars. I am updating my budget to include an additional $1.6 billion so that we can return to Space in a BIG WAY!
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) May 13, 2019
ANY OTHER BACKERS?
NONE other than the world’s richest man, Jeff Bezos, who could probably pay for the whole shebang out of his pocket money. The Amazon tycoon is an acknowledged space nut, and has his own Blue Origin space colonisation plans, but it remains to be seen how much he will be involved in Artemis – perhaps they’ll charge him for Amazon to get the delivery space parcel contract.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel