ROYAL Bank of Scotland has reported a dip in first-quarter profit as the lender was held back by economic uncertainty and competitive pressures.
The bank, still 62.4% owned by the taxpayer, saw bottom line profit fall 12.5% to £707 million in the three months to March 31.
Pre-tax operating profit also came in lower at £1 billion versus £1.2bn as RBS was hit by stiffer competition in the mortgage market and continuing uncertainty among businesses, with many reining in spending as Brexit fears linger.
RBS shares were down nearly 5% at 237.3p in morning trade.
The results come a day after RBS bosses warned at the bank’s AGM over a Brexit hit as uncertainty weighs on the economy. Chairman Sir Howard Davies told shareholders that worries over the EU departure were hampering economic growth, which will take its toll on the bank’s performance.
Outgoing chief executive Ross McEwan said: “This is a solid set of results set against a highly uncertain and competitive backdrop.
“We continue to support our customers through this Brexit uncertainty while investing and innovating in digital services to meet rapidly changing customer needs.”
In October, RBS set aside £100m to reflect the “more uncertain economic outlook” in Britain ahead of Brexit.
On Friday, the group said that while it is retaining its full year guidance, the “ongoing impact of Brexit uncertainty on the economy, and associated delay in business borrowing decisions, is likely to make income growth more challenging in the near term”.
The figures also show that RBS shed £45m in costs over the quarter and is on track to take £300m out of the group by the end of the financial year. RBS is having to come to terms with the departure of McEwan, who announced his departure on Thursday – his resignation coming after more than five-and-a-half years at the helm.
He has a year’s notice period and will stay in the post until a successor has been appointed, and to ensure an “orderly handover”. The New Zealander said he had achieved his strategy set out when he joined the bank, having returned the bank to profitability and put it on a firmer financial footing.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here