SAINSBURY'S has claimed there are serious flaws with the competition watchdog's report into its £12 billion merger with Asda, and argued the tie-up will deliver £1 billion in savings for shoppers as the deal hangs in the balance.
The supermarket said in a stock market update that it strongly disagrees with the Competition and Markets Authority's (CMA) provisional findings into the merger, which warned the deal could be blocked unless the pair sell off significant stores or even one of the brands.
Sainsbury's said the CMA's report contains "significant errors", both legal and economic.
"This is compounded by the CMA's choice of a threshold for identifying competition problems that does not fit the facts and evidence in the case and that is set at an unprecedentedly low level, therefore generating an unreasonably high number of areas of concern," the grocery firm said.
Last month, the CMA found 629 areas where there could be a substantial reduction in competition in supermarkets as a result of the tie-up, and a further 290 areas where online competition could be reduced.
The CMA added that it would be "difficult for the companies to address the concerns it has identified".
But Sainsbury's and Asda on Tuesday pledged to make a number of post-merger commitments, should it be approved.
It includes investing £1 billion a year in lowering prices by the third year of the deal completing, equating to a 10% cut on everyday items.
The price investment will be funded by an estimated £1.6 billion in cost savings, which will be secured by lowering purchase prices from suppliers, putting Argos stores into Asda, jointly buying shared goods and services and reducing central costs.
Sainsbury's also promised to cap its fuel gross profit margin to no more than 3.5p per litre for five years, while Asda will guarantee its existing fuel pricing strategy.
Sainsbury's chief executive Mike Coupe and Asda boss Roger Burnley said: "We are trying to bring our businesses together so that we can help millions of customers make significant savings on their shopping and their fuel costs, two of their biggest regular outgoings.
"We are committing to reducing prices by £1 billion per year by the third year, which would reduce prices by around 10% on everyday items. We are happy to be held to account for delivering on this commitment and to have our performance independently reviewed and to publish this annually.
"We hope that the CMA will properly take account of the evidence we have presented and correct its errors. We have proposed a reasonable yet conservative remedy package and hope the CMA considers this so that we can deliver the cost savings for customers."
Sainsbury's will also move to pay small suppliers within 14 days and Asda will continue to pay its small suppliers within that time frame, allaying concerns that SMEs could be disadvantaged by the deal.
The CMA is expected to publish Sainsbury's and Asda's responses to its provisional findings imminently, and the antitrust body's final report is expected by April 30.
Sainsbury's shares were up nearly 2% in midday trade at 239p.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here