PUBLIC spending watchdog the National Audit Office (NAO) has raised questions about “failings” in the UK Government’s £1.9 billion programme to protect the country’s critical infrastructure from cyber-attacks.
The NAO said the National Cyber Security Strategy 2016 included £1.3bn for a five-year National Cyber Security Programme to keep the country – one of the world’s leading digital economies – safe from attack.
However, it said failings in the way the Cabinet Office established the programme meant the Government did not know whether it will meet the programme’s goals.
Delivering the strategy was a “complex challenge” said the NAO, and the Government did not know which areas it should target to make “the biggest impact or address the greatest need”.
A section of the plan to protect power plants and hospitals was the only red area in the NAO’s assessment, which meant that fewer than 80% of projects to defend these areas would end on time.
Key targets were being “actively defended”, but methods to measure success in this area were still being developed.
The NAO said the Government itself had “low confidence” in the evidence gathered for half of its strategic plans, but noted this was an improvement on the “very low confidence” expressed late last year about the same topics.
NAO head, Amyas Morse, said: “Improving cyber security is vital to ensuring that cyber-attacks don’t undermine the UK’s ability to build a truly digital economy and transform public services. The Government has demonstrated its commitment to improving cyber security.
“However, it is unclear whether its approach will represent value for money in the short term and how it will prioritise and fund this activity after 2021.
“Government needs to learn from its mistakes and experiences in order to meet this growing threat.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here