THE Scottish Parliament will mount its own investigation into the fallout from sexual misconduct allegations against former First Minister Alex Salmond.
Holyrood is to set up a special committee, which will look at the Scottish Government’s handling of the complaints – strenuously denied by
Salmond – as well as his dealings with his successor Nicola Sturgeon.
The move was unanimously agreed by all parties at a meeting of the Parliamentary Bureau yesterday.
Holyrood officials will now consider the membership of the committee and what the remit should be for the probe.
A Scottish Parliament spokeswoman said: “Bureau members unanimously agreed to create a new committee of inquiry.
“Officials have been asked to prepare options on its remit and membership and these will be discussed at a future meeting of the bureau.”
Scottish Conservative interim leader Jackson Carlaw said afterwards: “I’m pleased that the Parliamentary Bureau has decided today to back the Scottish Conservative proposal for a Holyrood inquiry into this affair.
“An investigation has been botched, two complainants have been let
down and hundreds of thousands of pounds of taxpayers’ money has been wasted.
“These are clearly matters for the Scottish Parliament to investigate and the inquiry must be able to examine what went wrong and why this was allowed to happen.”
Labour leader Richard Leonard agreed the inquiry was the “right decision and a positive step forward”.
He added: “Full transparency in this matter is essential in order for the public to have confidence in the First Minister and the Scottish Government.
“That means full public and parliamentary scrutiny.
“At all times it is essential to remember that at the centre of all of this are two courageous women who put their faith in a system that has badly let them down and we must never lose sight of that by safeguarding the duty of care to them and their access to justice.”
Confirmation of the probe comes two days after Sturgeon confirmed she will refer herself to the panel of independent advisers to consider whether her actions breached the ministerial code of conduct.
She previously told MSPs she only became aware of the allegations – which date back to Salmond’s time as First Minister – when the pair met for talks at her Glasgow home on April 2 last year.
A key aide to the former first minister has said Sturgeon’s chief-of-staff Liz Lloyd “suspected” a complaint had been made the previous month.
Geoff Aberdein, who served as
Salmond’s chief-of-staff during his time in office, has revealed he met Lloyd twice in March last year.
At the second meeting in late March he said Lloyd confirmed “she suspected the Scottish Government had received an official complaint about Salmond”.
Aberdein said: “She made clear she did not know the full details of any potential complaint and had not alerted the First Minister to her suspicions about a potential complaint.”
A spokesman for Sturgeon said there was “quite clearly” a “vendetta” against Lloyd.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel