A MOVE to restrict dental check-ups to once every two years could put lives at risk, according to dentists.
The plans are to extend the dental recall interval for low-risk patients up to an interval of 24 months.
A study in response to the proposals, by the British Dental Association Scotland (BDA), indicated 97% of 206 dentists working across Scotland’s health boards said Scottish Government reforms would put oral cancer detection at risk.
Anas Sarwar MSP, a former NHS dentist, said: “Increasing rates of mouth and throat cancers in Scotland are a matter of serious concern.
“The wide variations in oral cancer incidence and survival rates between different areas and social groups in Scotland are unacceptable, with someone in Glasgow being twice more likely to be diagnosed with oral cancer than someone in Fife.”
Scotland has had a 37% increase in oral cancer deaths in the last decade, with residents in the most deprived areas twice as likely to be diagnosed or die from the condition.
If detected early, the survival rates of oral cancer are said to increase from 50% to 90%.
Sarwar added: “The Scottish Government, NHS Scotland and other bodies must develop sustainable and innovative approaches to oral cancer care and work effectively to improve the prevention, detection and treatment of this condition.”
The BDA estimates that the current cost of oral cancer treatment in Scotland is £67.3 million, with that expected to increase to £148.3m by 20136 if rates continue to rise.
The cost of treating oral cancer is £9000 per patient.
Loading...
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here