Royal Bank of Scotland has reported a 206% rise in first-quarter profit to £792 million as the taxpayer-owned bank continues on its road to recovery.
The figure, well ahead of consensus forecasts, compares with a £259 million profit in the same period in 2017.
It comes after the lender booked a bottom-line annual profit for the first time in a decade earlier this year.
Operating profit in the period rose 70% to £1.21 billion and chief executive Ross McEwan said the results are a sign of the progress the bank is making.
He added: "In the first three months of 2018, we made a pre-tax profit of £1.2 billion, up 70% on the same period last year. This contributed to a bottom-line profit in the period of £792 million, exceeding the full-year 2017 profit we reported back in February.
"This is a good set of results, showing the progress we are making, despite a more competitive market. Our income is up, costs are down and our capital has strengthened again."
Friday's numbers also show that RBS, still 72% owned by the taxpayer, booked £209 million in restructuring costs and £19 million in conduct and litigation charges.
While the lender did not show any charges for PPI or provisions for GRG, its restructuring unit, it is yet to reach what is expected to be a multibillion-dollar settlement with the US Department of Justice over claims that it mis-sold mortgage-backed securities in the run-up to the financial crisis.
The penalty is likely to dent the bank's full-year performance but, once a settlement is reached, it will allow RBS to kick-start the process of resuming dividends.
The Government said last year that plans to reprivatise RBS were under way, with the aim of selling £15 billion of its shares by 2023.
It wants to restart share sales in RBS by the end of the 2018-19 financial year and sell off £3 billion a year over five years - around two-thirds of its stake.
However, the Government faces a £26.2 billion loss on its stake, with the lender's shares languishing well below the average 502p share price paid during the 2008 and 2009 bailout, at around 272p at today's prices.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel