INVESTMENT planning in the financial services sector is still being hampered by Brexit uncertainty, despite expectations of a return to growth in the coming months, a new study suggests.
Profits in the sector are set to “stabilise”, a survey by the CBI and PwC of almost 100 companies indicated.
Optimism rose just before last month’s General Election, at the fastest pace since the summer of 2015, the report found.
It said improvement was driven by investment management, insurance broking and general insurance, but was flat in banks and building societies.
Profits in the sector continued to fall at the quickest pace in a decade, according to the CBI and PwC research.
Rain Newton-Smith, the CBI’s chief economist, warned that Brexit “continues to drag on” investment plans.
She commented: “It’s great that optimism has risen following four-and-a-half years of dire sentiment, with financial services firms also suggesting that an end to falling business volumes and profitability may be in sight.
“However, the sector isn’t quite out of the woods yet. Against the backdrop of another fall in business and profits, Brexit uncertainty continues to drag on investment plans, and concerns over labour shortages have spiked.
“As the UK begins a new future outside the European Union, the Government must do everything it can to support and stimulate one of the UK’s most globally competitive sectors, so that expectations of an upturn can come to pass – both over the next quarter and beyond.”
Andrew Kail, head of financial services at PwC, added: “The stirrings of optimism represent a significant turnaround given the flat and falling optimism that has beset the past four years.
“An uptick in hiring, investment in systems, and better profit expectations for the first three months of the new year are driving the positivity in the sector, following the general election.
“However, this year in particular, firms will need 20/20 vision in order to maximise performance. Not least as there is still work needed to bring clarity on Brexit transitional arrangements.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here