AFGHANISTAN’S former president has criticised both the US and Pakistan, accusing them of using the Afghan war to further their own interests.
Hamid Karzai called on Washington to sanction Pakistani military and intelligence officials.
He said his country is in “terrible shape” 16 years after the US-led invasion that toppled the Taliban. Karzai became president shortly after the fall of the Taliban and held office until 2014.
In recent weeks, Kabul has been battered by a wave of attacks claimed alternately by the Taliban and a rival Daesh affiliate, which killed scores of people and brutally exposed the US-backed government’s failure to secure the capital.
Karzai said: “The US cannot tell us: ‘Well, if I am not here, you will be worse off.’ We are in a terrible shape right now ... We want to be better. We want to have peace. We want to have security.”
The former president said Washington wants to establish permanent bases in Afghanistan to project power in the region, while Pakistan wants to turn Afghanistan into a client state.
He said US forces are not in Afghanistan “to stop extremism”.
“In my view their intention is to keep us divided and weak so they can carry on their objectives in this region,” Karzai added.
“They have their global politics and rivalries. They have China as a great rising power. They have Russia as a revitalised, re-energised great power on the world scene, and they feel threatened and challenged.”
Echoing complaints from the current government, Karzai accused neighbouring Pakistan of harbouring Taliban militants. He called on the US to sanction Pakistani military and intelligence officials.
“We hope the US will now act in Pakistan,” he said. “‘Act in Pakistan’ doesn’t mean that the Pakistan people should be hurt or that war should be launched in Pakistan.”
US president Donald Trump has ramped up pressure on Pakistan since the start of the year, suspending up to $2 billion (£1.4bn) in military aid after accusing it of failing to crack down on militants who launch cross-border attacks on US and Afghan forces.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here