JOANNA Cherry has claimed that the SNP’s former leader at Westminster, Ian Blackford, wants a peerage – suggesting it explains reports that he thinks the party should U-turn on its boycott of the chamber.
Cherry made the comment on social media in response to a story in the Times headlined: “Ian Blackford: Why SNP should stop opposing House of Lords membership.”
The story describes comments from the former SNP group leader made to student journalists during a meeting at Westminster, reporting that Blackford had “suggested the party should drop its opposition to membership of the House of Lords to increase nationalist influence in London”.
An SNP spokesperson strongly denied Blackford would take a seat in the House of Lords.
The Times reported that he had spoken of the possibility of an elected second chamber for Scotland after independence.
READ MORE: Yes supporters should sit in House of Lords, former chief strategist says
The SNP MP said that a change of policy would be “a question for the party, not a matter for me”, going on: “We are opposed to the House of Lords as it is constituted but if you get to the point of an independent Scotland, there is a legitimate debate about how many MSPs you need for a fully functioning parliament.
“I don’t think 129 is enough. Would you have some kind of elected senate in an independent Scotland to provide checks and balances? There would be a need to strengthen scrutiny, a need to have good governance.”
An SNP spokesperson said: “Ian is clear he would never take a seat in an unelected chamber and the unelected House of Lords should be abolished.
“The SNP does not take seats in the undemocratic Westminster institution which gives influence and power to the undeserving pals of Westminster parties like Tory peer Michelle Mone, who profited tens of millions of pounds from dodgy deals with the UK government during the pandemic.”
But Cherry, a prominent SNP MP who was demoted to the backbenches during Blackford’s time as group leader, claimed Blackford was seeking a peerage.
Responding to the story in the Times, she wrote: “Hhmmmm let me guess? [thinking emoji] Could it be because you want a peerage? [facepalm emoji]”.
Hhmmmm let me guess?🤔 Could it be because you want a peerage? 🤦♀️ / Ian Blackford: Why SNP should stop opposing House of Lords membershiphttps://t.co/Bgfy64UgzN
— Joanna Cherry KC (@joannaccherry) January 23, 2024
The remarks come after Stephen Noon, the former chief strategist for Yes in the 2014 referendum, told The National that independence supporters should take seats in the Lords.
“I know the movement probably would react cautiously to this idea. I mean, the House of Lords is not our favourite institution – but it's there, and can we use it?” he said.
“Within the movement, we've got figures who are respected and experienced. I suppose the point I'm making is that we have this talent within the movement, wouldn't it be good to be able to deploy it?”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel