RISHI Sunak has been accused of showing voters “complete and utter contempt” after he turned and walked away from a woman telling him about her daughter’s experience in hospital.
The Tory prime minister was on a visit to Winchester – a constituency which has been held by the Conservatives since 2010 – when the incident happened on Friday morning.
Sky News cameras captured Sunak talking to a member of the public in a rare moment of engagement allowed by the No10 press team.
READ MORE: 'Show leadership': Rishi Sunak and Keir Starmer urged to recognise state of Palestine
Sunak told her: “Last year, towards the end of the year, we had two months with virtually no strikes in October and November, and do you know what happened? The waiting lists fell by 150,000 over those two months.
“It just shows, when there aren’t strikes, we really can make progress. We didn’t last year, because of all the strikes.”
Prickly Sunak meets member of public.
— Sam Bright (@WritesBright) January 19, 2024
Patronises them, laughs at them, and then walks away halfway through encounter.
A genuine sign of contempt from PM towards ordinary voters.pic.twitter.com/mWn0XC13k5
The member of the public then manages to speak, saying: “Yeah, but you could stop it all. You could make it all go back to how it used to be. Where we had…”
At this point Sunak laughs in the woman’s face.
She went on: “Where we had, if you had a problem you could go to the hospital. My daughter spent seven hours waiting …”
As the woman was talking, Sunak said “yep” and turned and walked away. She catches up, but Sunak talks over her saying: "I'm sorry to hear that but the key thing is we have resolved all the industrial action, apart from the junior doctors who are still not saying yes."
The incident has been compared to Gordon Brown’s infamous “bigoted woman” comment, which was caught on a live mic during the 2010 General Election campaign.
Journalist Sam Bright shared the Sky News footage on social media, writing: “Prickly Sunak meets member of public.
“Patronises them, laughs at them, and then walks away halfway through encounter.
“A genuine sign of contempt from PM towards ordinary voters.”
Another user said the clip showed Sunak’s “complete and utter contempt”, while a third added: “Not interested in what the public have to say as he is too busy implementing the will of the people.”
READ MORE: Adam Price: Independence was a 'non-starter' in 1973. Now it is perfectly 'viable'
Others branded the clip “appalling”, while Scots comic Frankie Boyle wrote: “The walk off is genuinely amazing. It’s going to be a hell of an election.”
NHS doctor Henry Jefferson wrote: “Still pushing the line that strikes are responsible for the waiting lists I see.
“The data he is referring to is in fact from a period where the strikes did take place.”
Jefferson also shared a graphic from the FT showing waiting lists were well above seven million when the first doctor strike took place in March 2023, up from closer to 2.5 million in 2010.
Still pushing the line that strikes are responsible for the waiting lists I see.
— Henry Jefferson (@drhjefferson) January 19, 2024
The data he is referring to is in fact from a period where the strikes did take place.
Also this: https://t.co/kCJC0l6bNo pic.twitter.com/ni6cnMZYKI
Wes Streeting, Labour's shadow health secretary, said: "Rishi Sunak has no idea of the misery NHS patients are going through.
"When patients try to tell him, he laughs in their faces and walks away. When Sunak asks for their vote later this year, he will get a taste of his own medicine."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel