A WOMAN has been found “not guilty” of sending a threatening message to SNP MP Joanna Cherry.
Eve Shaw appeared at Edinburgh’s Sheriff Court on Monday, accused of sending an electronic message that was menacing in character.
Shaw had written, in a Twitter post from January 2022 responding to a friend commenting on a news story about the MP, that she was “gonna pop Joanna Cherry”.
Cherry told the court that she had interpreted the message as a threat to do her violence, but Shaw argued that it had been a “pun” on the SNP MP’s name.
“‘Pop’ refers to a gunshot or taking a pop at someone. I have to take these things seriously as two members of Parliament have been murdered since I became an MP,” Cherry said.
READ MORE: 'No truth' to scandal around BBC presenter, young person's lawyer says
Shaw said she did not take the initial contact from the police seriously as she “could not see how anyone could see this as a threat”.
She further said she had been arrested and charged after police raided her home and seized her electronic devices, Edinburgh Live reported.
Cherry’s chief of staff, Fraser Thomson, said he had seen the tweet and alerted police the following day after a conversation with the MP. He said he had taken it to be a “very serious” threat.
The sheriff said the tweet was “very unwise” but added that he had “reasonable doubt” as to Shaw’s guilt.
She was acquitted and found not guilty.
Cherry said after the verdict: "I’m grateful to the police for taking this matter seriously.
"This person’s Twitter feed which threatened violence towards me gave legitimate cause for serious concern. Whether to prosecute and what evidence to lead were matters for the Crown."
In June, the London Metropolitan police assessed another tweet aimed at Cherry and concluded it did not constitute a crime.
Cherry had reported a tweet in which a Twitter user – who appears to have since deleted their account – threatened: “I’d kill her with my bare hands if I saw her [in real life]”.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel