THE Home Secretary has accused the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) of “undermining a democratically-elected government” after her plan to deport migrants to Rwanda was blocked last year.
During her appearances on various media outlets this morning, Suella Braverman was asked about her Rwanda policy and the prospect of people fleeing to the UK from the war in Sudan.
She said she wanted to avoid a “re-run” ahead of a debate in Parliament on Wednesday about an amendment to the Illegal Migration Bill which would give the UK Government powers to ignore the Strasbourg court’s rulings.
Speaking on BBC Radio 4’s Today programme, Braverman said if the bill is successful, they would “not put a limit” on the number of migrants they could deport to Rwanda.
She said: “If you look at Australia – once they were able to swiftly detain and remove people from Australian territory, their numbers of illegal arrivals fell dramatically in a relatively short period of time.
"There is no good reason for anybody to get into a small boat to cross the Channel in search of a new life in the UK."@SuellaBraverman is asked what will happen if people fleeing the war in Sudan attempt to cross the Channel.
— Sky News (@SkyNews) April 26, 2023
More: https://t.co/oLwydfQf16
📺 Sky 501 pic.twitter.com/4kMNAXM8yk
“That’s why deterrence is a key ingredient. It is an uncapped scheme so we are not putting a limit on the number of people who can be relocated to Rwanda.
“We saw last year an unacceptable situation whereby the Home Secretary made a decision to relocate people to Rwanda and that decision was upheld in the courts, injunctions were refused by the English courts and, at the 11th hour, pursuant to an opaque process in which the UK was not represented, a judge in Strasbourg overruled that decision, undermining a democratically-elected government and a decision to take appropriate action.
“We have to avoid a re-run of that scenario. That’s why we have included measures in our Bill to afford the Home Secretary a discretion to consider the case upon its particular merits and circumstances.”
‘Values at odds with our country’
In a separate interview with LBC Radio, Braverman said that migrants coming to the UK across the English Channel in small boats “possess values which are at odds with our country” with “heightened levels of criminality”.
“There are real challenges which go beyond the migration issue of people coming here illegally. We need to ensure that we bring an end to the boat crossings.”
READ MORE: Jacob Rees-Mogg left stunned as journalist slams 'disgusting' Tories
During an interview with Sky News, Braverman was also asked about the prospect of people fleeing to the UK from Sudan.
It comes as the UK continues to evacuate British nationals from the country amid escalating conflict.
Braverman said: “Our position in Sudan is that we are sorting British nationals, British passport holders and their dependents.”
Asked what would happen to those who arrive from Sudan, she said: “That’s why we are passing a new law at the moment. To deal with people who come here illegally.
“There is no good reason for anybody to get into a small boat to [go] in search of a life in the United Kingdom.
“If you are somebody who is fleeing Sudan for humanitarian reasons, there are various mechanisms you can use.
“The UNHCR (United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees) is present in the region and they are the right mechanism by which people should apply if they do want to seek asylum in the United Kingdom.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel