EMPLOYERS are being accused of having “antiquated” attitudes to recruiting women as new evidence revealed many believe it is reasonable to ask about plans to have children during a job interview.
A survey of over 1100 decision-makers found three out of five agreed a woman should disclose whether she is pregnant during the recruitment process and almost half thought it was acceptable to find out if women had young children.
The Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) said its study showed many employers needed more support to better understand the basics of discrimination law
and the rights of pregnant women and new mothers.
EHRC chief executive Rebecca Hilsenrath said: “It is a depressing reality that, when it comes the rights of pregnant woman and new mothers in the workplace, we are still living in the dark ages. We should all know very well that it is against the law not to appoint a woman because she is pregnant or might become pregnant.
“Yet we also know women routinely get asked questions around family planning in interviews.”
Sarah, a mother of two young children who was made redundant during maternity leave for her first child, said: “It’s sad to think that things like this are still happening. I feel angry all the time that you can be a mother with young children and unless you’re in a job that protects you, your whole world can come tumbling down – out of your control.
“It is essential for employers to be honest and ensure there is good communication between them and those on maternity leave so that pregnant women and new mothers are given the support they deserve.”
The EHRC said its survey revealed antiquated beliefs, including two out of five saying women who have had more than one child while in the same job can be a “burden” to their team.
Half of those questioned said workers sometimes resented women who were pregnant or on maternity leave.
TUC general secretary Frances O’Grady said that women should not be forced to choose between having a career and a family.
“But thousands are being forced from their job every year. Pregnancy discrimination scars lives and careers,” she added.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here