UP to half of the millennial generation could still be renting in their 40s and a third could be “retiree renters”, a report warns.
The Resolution Foundation think tank said that if home ownership growth in Britain follows the “weak pattern” of the 2000s, up to half of millennials born between 1981 and 2000 could be renting either privately or in the social rented sector in their 40s, and a third could still be renting by the time they claim their pensions.
The Foundation said radical reform is needed to make the private rental sector fit for raising children and retirement “because a generation of young people face the prospect of never owning their own home”.
In a report published by the Resolution Foundation for its Intergenerational Commission, it said policy has failed to catch up with the fact that bringing up children in the private rental sector has become mainstream.
Private renting has grown rapidly in recent decades, the Home Improvements report said.
At age 30, four in 10 millennials live in this way, double the rate at the same age for generation X – the generation above millennials – and four times that for baby boomers born in the 20 years after the end of the Second World War.
A record 1.8 million families with children rent privately, up from just 600,000 15 years ago, the report said.
The Foundation said that a “rising share of retiree renters, coupled with an ageing population, could more than double the housing benefit bill for pensioners from £6.3 billion today to £16bn by 2060 – highlighting how everyone ultimately pays for failing to tackle Britain’s housing crisis”.
Lindsay Judge, senior policy analyst at the Resolution Foundation, said: “Britain’s housing problems have developed into a full-blown crisis over recent decades and young people are bearing the brunt.
“While there have been some steps recently to support house building and first-time buyers, up to a third of millennials still face the prospect of renting from cradle to grave.
“If we want to tackle Britain’s ‘here and now’ housing crisis we have to improve conditions for the millions of families living in private rented accommodation.
“That means raising standards and reducing the risks associating with renting through tenancy reform and light touch rent stabilisation.”
The Foundation said, to give tenants longer-term stability in their homes, indeterminate tenancies should be introduced as the sole form of contract in England and Wales, following Scotland’s lead.
It said there must be a “fair balancing of the needs of tenants with the rights of landlords”, and landlords should not be able to end tenancies at short notice without good cause.
To keep rents stable, rent rises should be limited to the Consumer Prices Index (CPI) measure of inflation over three-year periods, the report said. A new housing tribunal should be set up, to ensure landlords and tenants can have disputes resolved swiftly, the Foundation argued.
Founded in 2005, the Resolution Foundation aims to produce research to show the challenges facing those on low to middle incomes and developing solutions to these problems. It is primarily funded by the Resolution Trust.
The Foundation has been awarded UK Social Policy Think Tank of the Year (2015) and UK Think Tank of the Year (2013), UK Social Policy Think Tank of the Year and Publication of the Year (2012).
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here